For bulk supply, established distributors usually beat retail chains — they hold industrial quantities and issue material certificates. Suppliers frequently mentioned include:
sources cited
Search handed your buyer ten links and let them choose. An assistant hands them a decision and a short list of who to trust. There is no page two to be found on.
So we ask what your buyers ask, put it to those assistants for real, count how often you come back, and name whoever gets recommended in your place.
Every site gets a single AI Readiness Score across the three things that decide whether an engine can use you.
Access is whether a machine can reach your content. Structure is whether it can tell what your pages are about. Content is whether there is anything here worth quoting — and that is where nearly every site loses.
example report · scored across 30 pages
No account, no tracking script, no access to your systems, nothing for your developer to deploy.
The way an AI crawler does — which is not the way your browser does.
Against a fixed rubric, so the same site always gets the same number.
Real buyer questions, asked repeatedly, counted as a rate.
What to change, where, and the exact text or markup to paste in.
Every finding says what is wrong, what it costs you in plain language, the number measured on your own page, and the exact fix — written for your site, not copied from a checklist.
example-supplier.com
sample36
issues found
+58.4
points recoverable
12/19/5
critical / important / minor
what to fix
the problems
One script tag, written once and dropped into your template, tells a machine what your company is, what this site is and where the reader is standing. Everything below goes into that one block.
01No structured data+5.4 ptsbest practice
affects 12 pages
Nothing on these pages tells a machine what they are — a company, a product, an article. Without it a reader has to infer the answer from your prose, and gets it wrong often enough to matter.
0 structured data blocks
02No Organization markup+2.6 ptsdocumentedsource
affects 12 pages
Nothing on your site formally states your company's name, address and identity in a way machines read. That is what connects your site to a recognised business.
the fix
01No structured data
Your pages carry no structured data at all, so nothing states in machine-readable form that you are a company, what you sell, or how to reach you. Adding it is one block of code in your template.
where: inside <head>, on every page
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Your company",
"url": "https://example.com",
"description": "Bulk supplier of industrial fasteners…",
"areaServed": "CZ",
"contactPoint": {
"@type": "ContactPoint",
"telephone": "+420…",
"contactType": "sales"
}
}
</script>02No Organization markup
The same block covers this one. Once the Organization entry above is in place, fill in the two fields that turn it from a company that exists into a company an assistant can describe.
done when
the problem
best practiceAn assistant will not stake an answer on a site that does not say who wrote it, who runs it, or how to reach them. Cheap to fix, and it gates everything else.
A reader who lands here cannot quickly tell who you are, what you sell and who it is for. If a person cannot, an assistant certainly cannot.
assessed 1 out of 3
the fix
Nowhere on your homepage does one plain sentence say what your company sells and who it sells to. A machine reading the page has to infer it from your slogan, and it infers wrong.
where: directly after your <h1>
<p class="lede">
We supply industrial fasteners and fixings in bulk to construction
and manufacturing companies across Central Europe, from stock,
with material certificates.
</p>the problem
best practiceA quotable sentence is short, concrete, and still true when it is lifted out of the page. These are the places where yours are none of those things.
affects 9 pages
The text is short on checkable facts — numbers, dates, specifics. A claim with a figure in it can be verified and attributed to you; an adjective cannot.
0.4 concrete facts per 100 words
the fix
Your pages make claims without numbers behind them. An answer engine quotes the source that says something checkable, and there is very little here it could quote.
the problem
documentedsourceOne small file at the root of your domain decides which machines are allowed to read you. Right now it is not saying what you think it is saying.
Your robots.txt refuses crawlers that build the indexes answer engines retrieve from. While that stands, no amount of good content will get you into their answers — they cannot read the page in the first place.
4 of 8 AI crawlers blocked
the fix
Your robots.txt blocks four of the crawlers that answer engines retrieve from, including the one behind ChatGPT's search. While that stands, nothing else in this report can help you — those engines cannot read the page in the first place.
where: https://example-supplier.com/robots.txt
User-agent: Googlebot
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /the problem
documentedsourceMost answer engines do not run your JavaScript. Whatever appears only after the page boots is, as far as they are concerned, not on the page at all.
affects 14 pages
Most of your text only appears after the browser runs code. Google Search does render JavaScript, but the crawlers behind the answer engines largely do not — so where a visitor sees a full page, several of the systems this report measures see a nearly empty one.
only 31% of the text is readable without JavaScript
the fix
Two thirds of your text appears only after the browser runs JavaScript. Google Search renders it; the crawlers behind the answer engines largely do not, so most of what a visitor reads is invisible to them.
the problem
documentedsourceThe title and the description are the two lines a machine reads before it decides what a page is about. Fixing them is one pass through your pages.
affects 2 pages
This page has no title. It is the single most important line for both search results and AI answers, and yours is blank.
title is 0 characters
the fix
Two of your news articles ship with no <title> element at all, so search engines and answer engines have nothing but the on-page heading to name them by.
where: inside <head> on the article template
<title>New production plant to create 200 jobs | Example Supplier</title>the problem
best practiceAssistants answer questions. A page written as a brochure gives them nothing to lift; a page written as an answer gives them a paragraph they can use whole.
affects 9 pages
The page describes what you offer but does not answer what a buyer needs to know to decide. Those unanswered questions are being answered by someone else.
3 of 104 headings are a question a buyer would ask
the fix
Your pages are written as descriptions rather than as answers. Three of a hundred and four headings phrase a question a buyer would actually type, and assistants answer by lifting the passage that answers the question they were asked.
the problems
Undated text is treated as text of unknown age, and unknown age loses to a dated page every single time — even when yours is the better answer.
01No publication or update dates+3.1 ptsbest practice
affects 12 pages
Nothing says when this was written or updated. Undated text is text of unknown age, and a reader with no way to date it has no way to judge whether it still holds.
no publication or update date on the page
02Content has not been updated+2.0 ptsbest practice
Nothing on the site has been updated in a long time. A page with no sign of maintenance gives a reader — human or machine — no way to tell whether it is still true.
nothing updated for 780 days
the fix
01No publication or update dates
None of your pages carry a published or updated date, visibly or in the markup, so nothing on the site can be dated by anything reading it.
02Content has not been updated
Nothing on the site has changed in over two years. A page with no sign of maintenance gives a reader — human or machine — no way to tell whether it is still true.
done when
A score means nothing without the scale it sits on. These are the four bands, and the stretch almost everyone lands in.
↑ where most sites land · 45–65
A site can load in under a second, rank on the terms it has always ranked for, and have been redesigned twice in five years — and still sit in the shaded band. Nothing about it looks broken, which is exactly why nobody has fixed it. The pages simply do not give an answer engine anything it can lift and attribute, so it lifts from somebody else.
The free scan tells you whether you have a problem. The full report is how you fix it.
Free scan
$0
1 page · 14 days
Full report
launch price$49$69
30 pages · 3 engines · 24 months
Launch price while we are new. It goes to $69. A report you buy now stays yours for 24 months either way.
The exact paragraph, the missing tag, the measured number from your own page. Nothing here tells you to improve your content without showing the sentence it means.
Measured against a fixed rubric, not a model's mood. Run it twice on an unchanged site and the number is identical — so when it moves, you moved it.
The competitors in your report are the domains answer engines actually cited when your buyer's question was asked. We do not infer them from keywords.
Short answers. If yours is not here, the free scan answers most of them by just running.
The free scan is usually under a minute. The full report takes up to 15 minutes, because we crawl politely — one page a second — and ask the answer engines several times over. You can close the tab; the link keeps working.
No. You paste a web address. We read your site from the outside, exactly as a search or AI crawler would. Nothing to add to your code, no login to share, no meeting to book.
No. SEO asks whether you rank in a list of links. We ask whether an answer engine can read your content, understand what you sell, and quote you — and we measure it by asking. Technical hygiene matters, but it is the smaller half.
No, and treat anyone who promises that with suspicion. Answer engines change constantly and nobody controls what they cite. What you get is a precise picture of where you stand and what is holding you back.
They can do the work — the report is written for them to execute. What they cannot easily do is measure it: knowing which of 61 factors actually costs you points, and which competitors are being cited instead, is the part that takes the crawling and the engine testing.
Companies with a working website built for how search worked a few years ago. If your site is already fully structured and widely cited, you will get a high score and little else.
It takes less time than reading this page did.